jump to navigation

Semiprime Time July 4, 2008

Posted by Aleks Essex in : Voting Goals, Voting Policy , trackback

Computer scientist and election technology analyst Avi Rubin touched on some familiar themes in an interview yesterday:

There are cryptographic techniques that can be used to achieve software independence so that even if there’s a bug in the software, you’ll detect if there’s a problem. But those are not ready for prime time in my opinion.

Though I’m generally more optimistic about this, it’s a fair statement, especially since there hasn’t yet been any definitive event to have changed many minds. The question I put to you, fair reader, is how do we recognize when the time has come? It would seem, as in Rubin’s case, a conservative assessment of the situation would best allow one to avoid taking a premature position on the matter.

I suppose there are only two factors to take into account. One is a stable convergence of the technology with a consistent, set of security ideals. However this by itself may be too abstract to be appreciated by the general public.

Naturally for me as an engineer, the defining characteristic of a technology entering “prime time” is its first successful deployment in the field.

But perhaps we can never say for certain the time has come, only that now is as good a time as any.

The content of posts to the Punchscan blog belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the thoughts, feelings, or opinions of the Punchscan voting project.

del.icio.us:Semiprime Time digg:Semiprime Time spurl:Semiprime Time wists:Semiprime Time simpy:Semiprime Time newsvine:Semiprime Time blinklist:Semiprime Time furl:Semiprime Time reddit:Semiprime Time fark:Semiprime Time blogmarks:Semiprime Time Y!:Semiprime Time smarking:Semiprime Time magnolia:Semiprime Time segnalo:Semiprime Time gifttagging:Semiprime Time

Comments»

no comments yet - be the first?